Use of mark in Indian market necessary to establish prior rights
(IPAB) has ruled categorically that trademark law is not extra-territorial and that, therefore, use of a mark in the Indian market is necessary to establish prior rights (April 5 2013, Rectification No ORA/56/2005/TM/MUM).
mark GATSBY in Class 3 of the Nice Classification.
2. Mandom claimed prior adoption of the mark GATSBY on the international market since 1978, and
3. Mandom claimed to have used the mark GATSBY in India since 1998. 4. Fem had registered the mark GATSBY in India in August 1994. No opposition was filed by Mandom
5. Fem claimed to have test-marketed products under the GATSBY mark in 1994-1995. Further, in 2003
it revived its use by seeking permission from the Food & Drug Authority to manufacture cosmetic products under the mark GATSBY.
1. Fem’s adoption of an identical GATSBY mark, 15 years after its adoption of the mark, for Class 3
2. A market survey in Mumbai revealed no use of the GATSBY mark. Thus, Fem's claim of alleged use
3. An internet search for the mark GATSBY would bring up Mandom's products. Thus, the mark was
exclusively associated with Mandom. It had also acquired the status of a well-known mark.
1. It had conceived and adopted the mark GATSBY in 1994 based on the novel “The Great Gatsby”,
authored by F Scott Fitzgerald published in 1925.
2. It had registered GATSBY in India before Mandom commenced its alleged use. 3. Mandom has made contradictory claims of use and had not disclosed its first application for
GATSBY, filed in India in December 1998.
4. Mandom could not avail itself of the non-use provisions, as the five-year non-use period had to be
calculated as of the date on which the mark was entered in the register.
The IPAB ruled in favour of Fem and dismissed Mandom’s cancellation petition, holding that the latter had not been able to establish prior use of the GATSBY mark in India. Further, it found that the reasons put forward by Fem for its adoption of the GATSBY mark seemed credible. The IPAB was of the view that there was no evidence placed on the record by Mandom to show that Fem had prior knowledge of the GATSBY mark. The IPAB nevertheless noted that Mandom was the first to adopt the mark on the international market (a good 15 years before Fem).
The IPAB thus showed its unease with the trademark registry's current practice of accepting proprietorship claims at face value, and only “looking at the register of trademark which, in the long run, sullies the image of the trademark registry”. Interestingly, the IPAB criticised the current examination practice, but did not cancel Fem’s registration by exercising its appellate powers. On the one hand, the IPAB noted that trademark law has no extra-territorial application, but at the same time, it advocated that internet searches should be carried out by the examiner at the examination stage to have a ‘global perspective’ and not limit him/herself to searching the register.
Ajay Kumar, Ranjan Narula Associates, New Delhi
World Trademark Review () is a subscription-based, practitioner-led,
bi-monthly publication and daily email service which focuses on the issues that matter to trademark
professionals the world over. Each issue of the magazine provides in-depth coverage of emerging
national and regional trends, analysis of important markets and interviews with high-profile
trademark personalities, as well as columns on trademark management, online issues and
Probentag Palmeri mit allen Chören 10.00 – 16.00 h Probentag Palmeri mit allen Chören 10.00 – 16.00 h E-Mail: [email protected] aabends Barentin-Konzert im TAW (1 Satz Palmeri + 3 Liebe KammerchorsängerInnen! In diesem Zeitraum diverse Proben und 1-3 Konzerte Ich möchte Euch allen, die ich bislang noch nicht habe sehen können, von Herzen ein gutes, gesundes
Below you find a summary of my findings on calculations with dimensional decibels. Although this should be quite straightforward and commonly known, I was not ableto find a concise calculation rule anywhere on the web. As such, I decided to try andwrite one myself. At the end, in ‘Examples’, you find my consequent opinion on a measure for phasenoise, the carrier-to-noise-density-ratio. If y