A comprehensive online news service
Vol. 30, No. 48, December 4, 2009
JACKSON SHUFFLING OF KEY EPA CIVIL RIGHTS OFFICE STAFF SPARKS CRITICISM
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is replacing a key Office of Civil Rights (OCR) official with the official’s long-time
protégé — potentially on an interim basis — drawing criticisms that Jackson’s shakeup of the embattled office is onlyreshuffling OCR personnel who have a losing track record of reforming the office.
Instead, critics say Jackson should bring in “new blood” to the office if the administrator wants to fulfill her vow
Jackson has made the decision to replace Yasmin Yorker — who as head of OCR’s external complaints program
was directly responsible for addressing discrimination complaints against EPA-funded activities filed under Title VIof the Civil Rights Act — with Helena Wooden-Aguilar, a long-time protégé of Yorker’s, an EPA source says. Yorkerwill now serve as a special assistant to OCR Director Karen Higginbotham. A second EPA source says Wooden-Aguilar’s tenure is likely only temporary.
Wooden-Aguilar was the lead investigator on a discrimination complaint filed by the Rosemere Neighborhood
Association at issue in a recent federal court ruling that highlighted EPA’s “consistent pattern of delay” in respond-ing to complaints, sparking Jackson’s vow to reform OCR and its handling of Title VI complaints (Inside EPA, Sept.
An EPA spokesman touts Jackson’s efforts to overhaul the office, arguing she has “taken very public and
proactive steps to rectify this critical process to better serve the American people,” but did not confirm the personnelswitch. “Unfortunately I can’t confirm anything related to personnel matters,” the spokesman says.
The staff shuffle is failing to answer critics who say Jackson’s personnel picks are only recycling through
officials that have failed to address the longstanding problems of the office in the past.
“I don’t know if that’s going to help,” one civil rights activist says. “It would be preferable to find someone to
reform [OCR] who doesn’t have a personal stake in an honest assessment of the past program’s failures.”
Previously, Jackson announced Nov. 12 that she has hired Patrick Chang, deputy chief of the Department of
Justice’s (DOJ) civil rights office, as senior counsel for external civil rights to help reform OCR.
But Chang’s hire underscores the legal uncertainty facing EPA in resolving discrimination complaints based on
disparate impact claims — which allege an EPA-funded action disproportionately affects a minority community —because he took part in a 2001 blue-ribbon panel that tried, and failed, to resolve whether the agency can use Title VIto pursue such claims, which represent the majority of Civil Rights complaints (Inside EPA, Nov. 20).
Chang was a member of the so-called Ginsberg Task Force — named after panel head Gail Ginsberg — which
tried to eliminate EPA’s backlog of discrimination complaints and aimed to make EPA’s first finding of Title VI discrimi-nation based on the disproportionate impact of a federally funded policy on minorities. More than two years later, thetask force disbanded, having cleared some of the backlog but failing to resolve the disparate impact issue.
OCR has authority under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to strip beneficiaries of federal funding if it finds
the funds are being used in a discriminatory manner.
Agency documents obtained by Inside EPA show some OCR investigations have been open for up to 15 years,
despite a regulatory 180-day deadline for issuing discrimination findings. OCR has informally resolved 10 Title VIcomplaints since 1993 but has never exercised its Civil Rights Act authority to strip funding due to discrimination.
In addition to deep internal strife and charges of incompetence within OCR, legal uncertainty over Title VI has
long stymied the office. For instance, OCR has long avoided pursuing civil rights complaints alleging discriminationbased on disparate impact for fear that the agency would lose such a case if challenged in court, even though almostall the Title VI complaints over the last two decades are based on the theory
But an EPA spokeswoman recently said that despite the uncertainty, the agency will proceed. “In accordance
with current law, [DOJ] guidance and agency regulations, EPA will continue to consider disparate impact complaints.”
As part of the staff shuffle in the civil rights office, Wooden-Aguilar will take over managing EPA’s Title VI
discrimination complaints, but critics point to her role in a recent civil rights case as a negative sign on her ability totruly revamp the office, after a court found major delays in EPA addressing civil rights complaints.
Wooden-Aguilar was appointed by EPA to be the agency’s lead investigator of the Rosemere Neighborhood
Association’s allegations that the City of Vancouver had discriminated in its provision of municipal services, such as
Copyright 2009 Inside Washington Publishers. Reprinted with permission.
stormwater treatment, after another OCR staffer was removed from the case for displaying “bias” against the neigh-borhood group. Yorker remained involved as well, sources say.
A civil rights activist says both Wooden-Aguilar and Yorker were “fairly cordial and professional,” but did not
conduct interviews suggested by Rosemere and ultimately made no progress on the case.
Years beyond the statutory deadline by which OCR is required to issue a final verdict on the original complaint,
Rosemere filed suit under the Administrative Procedure Act to compel OCR to act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the9th Circuit issued a major decision Sept. 17 in the case, Rosemere Neighborhood Association v. EPA, finding that thegroup’s “experience before the EPA appears, sadly and unfortunately, typical of those who appeal to OCR to remedycivil rights violations. . . . This pattern of delay . . . helps convince us that this action should go forward.”
The civil rights activist notes that Wooden-Aguilar, Yorker, Higginbotham and Chang — in his tenure at DOJ —
were “all involved in a vigorous defense” in court of OCR’s failure to respond to the complaint. — Jonathan Strong
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of the story inaccurately described civil rights discrimination complaints as
filed against EPA. The complaints at issue challenge EPA-funded activities, not the agency.
Copyright 2009 Inside Washington Publishers. Reprinted with permission.
Counterfeiting and Piracy Harm the Brazilian Economy Economic Impact by Major Industry SectorsBrazil-U.S. Business CouncilThe Brazil-U.S. Business Council is a private sector organization focusedon promoting the free flow of trade and investment between Brazil andthe United States. In the pursuit of this goal, our bilateral nature makesus uniquely effective. With a U.S. Section represent
Sara Lynn Vassallo EMPLOYMENT: Research Asst/Lab Manager, George Church Lab, Dept of Genetics, Harvard Medical School Nov 2005 – August 2013 • Expertly performed 400+ plates of emulsion PCR (including post-PCR modifications, protocol development, troubleshooting, imaging, PowerPoint presentations, reagent ordering for the team) to support the development of our lab’s sequencing