Pp187_platinum_letter.pdf

Retention and Separation
of Highly Polar
Compounds on a
Novel HPLC Phase
Neil R. Herbert, Ian Chappell, Joyce Wang,
Scott Anderson, Mark Jacyno, Wendy Luo
:DXNHJDQ5RDG'HHU¿HOG,/86$ Grace Davison Discovery Sciences
bringingseparationstogether
Summary
The selectivity of Grace® Platinum™ column phases is discussed in relation to that of
more traditional C18 phases. The unique surface structure and bonding technology
has assured that the phase has kept pace with more recently developed materials to
retain its position as a key alternative to standard C18 phases in the market today.
Introduction
Although RP HPLC has been a routine analytical technique since the early
1970s, developments in packing material technology are still advancing. Material
development, column hardware technology, instrument design and market needs
KDYHFROOHFWLYHO\FRQWULEXWHGWRVLJQL¿FDQWDGYDQFHPHQWVLQ+3/&SHUIRUPDQFH
7KH¿UVWJHQHUDWLRQW\SH$VLOLFDPDWHULDOVZHUHYHU\XVHIXODQGWKHLUVKRUWFRPLQJVwith bases, for instance, were overcome by the addition of mobile phase additives to suppress acidic silanol activity. This led to the development of base deactivated type A silicas and then inert silicas, often made from organic sols. These were characterized by a low level of acidic silanols and a very low level of trace metals. The metal content of type A silicas was a characteristic of the particular brand and often indicated the production method and raw materials. Thus, material could have for example, 150ppm calcium or <10, 2000ppm sodium or <20, several hundred ppm iron or aluminium or <10 depending on the brand. Aluminium added stability at high mobile phase pH but gave very poor chromatography with chelating compounds. Bonding technology was generally geared to producing phases with a high coverage and a high degree of end-capping to give a minimal level of free, accessible silanols. Over the last 10 years, polar pharmaceutical compounds have come to the forefront and can pose severe problems for standard C18 materials best suited to the separation of non- to moderately polar compounds. Shorter chain RP phases can be used but very short chain materials (<C4) suffer stability problems at low and high pH (<pH2 and >pH8). Polar embedded phases (such as carbamate and amide) and AQ phases have been introduced which give improved polar retention and are stable in 100% aqueous mobile phases. Hybrid phases and bidentate phases have also been introduced for general RP applications.
In the late 1990s, a novel approach was taken by Alltech, now a part of Grace, with the introduction of their Platinum™ column product line1. Base-deactivated phases and high coverage inert materials typically give good chromatography with most analytes, including bases, but also give similar selectivity. The new Grace®Platinum™ column phases, standard and EPS versions, give markedly different selectivity with polar analytes and therefore can give orthoganol selectivity to a standard high coverage, end-capped C18 or C8. In addition, because of the pure nature of the surface and the uniform covering of inert vicinal silanols, peak shape with chelators and bases is generally very good (although highly polar bases can produce some degree of tailing). Development work on the Grace® Platinum™ column range has continued and it is still a leading orthoganol phase compared to a standard high coverage material.
Results and Discussion
7KH(36([WHQGHG3RODU6HOHFWLYLW\EHQH¿WVRIGrace® Platinum™ columns have
been discussed previously1,2 By examining data on the chromatography of substituted
benzene derivatives, the EPS effect of various substituents can be determined relative
to methyl benzene (toluene), e.g., chlorobenzene would have 33% greater retention
than expected, phenol 85% and benzylamine 837% when compared to toluene
on a high coverage phase bonded on the same base silica. The standard Grace®
Platinum™ column phase has equivalent values of 7%, 42% and 154%.
An example of the improvement in resolution possible from the EPS effect is seen in Figure A1, a pharmaceutical test mix run at pH 7.
1. Procaine
2. Lidocaine
3. Tetracaine
4. Diphenhydramine
5. Amitriptyline
(a) Waters® Symmetry® C18, (b) GL Sciences Inertsil® ODS 2, (c) Thermo Hypersil® BDS C18, (d) Macherey, Nagel Gmbh & Co. Nucleosil® ODS AB, (e) Standard Grace® Platinum™ C18, (f) Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18 Mobile Phase: Methanol:0.025M
Flow Rate: 2.0mL/min
Detector:
Figure A
The Grace® Platinum™ C18 column chromatogram shows a marked increase in retention for the bases compared to the more conventional C18 columns. Selectivity is starting to change. The Grace® Platinum™ C18 (36FROXPQFKURPDWRJUDPVKRZVDIXUWKHULQFUHDVHLQUHWHQWLRQDQGFKDQJHLQVHOHFWLYLW\7KHGLI¿FXOWSDLURIlidocaine and tetracaine are now fully resolved away from the solvent front and with good peak shape. Note the movement of procaine and tetracaine. Also note that it is not necessary to fully end-cap a phase to obtain good peak shape. In fact, with an inert, fully hydrated silica, non-end capped phases often give better peak shape due to absence of lone silanols and the presence of hydrogen bonded vicinal silanol groups. A further example differentiating the Grace® Platinum™ C18 column separation from the Grace® Platinum™ C18 EPS column separation, which is due solely to the EPS effect, is shown in Figure B1. Here the base silicas and bonding technology are identical with just a bonding methodology difference producing the EPS effect. The pindolol in particular shows marked increase in retention due to the interaction between the very basic isopropylamine, the arylamine and the aliphatic hydroxyl groups with the surface silanols.
1. Pindolol
2. Pentoxifylline
3. Isoxsuprine
Pindolol
Pentoxifylline
Isoxsuprine
Nifedipine
4. Nifedipine Degradant
5. Nifedipine
(a) Standard Grace® Platinum™ C18, (b) Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18, both 4.6 x 150mm, 5µm Mobile Phase:
0.025M Potassium Phosphate (dibasic, pH 3.0):Methanol (50:50) Flow Rate:
Detector:
Figure B
Grace® Platinum™ column phases are characterized by their low surface coverage. The Grace® Platinum™ C18 column phase has a carbon level of 6% from a 210m2/gm silica and the C18 EPS a carbon level of 5%. This compares approximately to 10% for a fully bonded and end-capped phase with a similar surface area. A typical type B silica with a surface area of 300m2/gm would have a carbon level of 17%. This reduced hydrophobicity leads to a reduced reversed-phase mechanism retention and shorter elution times for a given mobile phase for non-polar compounds. In the case of moderately polar compounds, the reduced non-polar retention but increased polar retention on the residual silanols could balance each other out, but for polar molecules the lower non-polar retention would be more than compensated for by the enhaced polar retention. This is illustrated in Figure C2 of carboxylic acids of varying polarity. Both the Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18 and C8 column phases give good peak shapes and baseline resolution, the latter having a slightly shorter retention time of less than 5 minutes. The fully bonded phase of similar surface area gives JRRGVKDSHGSHDNVDQGEDVHOLQHUHVROXWLRQEXWKDVDUXQWLPHRIPLQXWHVDQGWKHDVVD\PD\EHQH¿WIURPWKHXVHof gradient elution. Thus, the Grace® Platinum™ columns give much reduced run times which will increase throughput.
1. Acetylsalicylic
2. Cinnamic Acid
3. 4-Butylbenzoic Acid
4. 4-Octylbenzoic Acid
8 10 12 14 Min.
(a) Grace® Brava™ base-deactivated silica C18, (b) Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18,(c) Grace® Platinum™ EPS C8, all 4.6 x 100mm, 5µm Mobile Phase:
(a,b) Acetonitrile:50mM monobasic Potassium Phosphate, pH 3.0 (50:50)(c) Acetonitrile:50mM monobasic Potassium Phosphate (40:60) Flow Rate:
Temperature:
Figure C
Grace® Platinum™ column phases are available with 2 different degrees of coverage so that the optimum EPS effect can be utilized. In Figure D2, separation of anticonvulsants, the standard Grace® Platinum™ column phase gives a better chromatogram by controlling the movement of the lamotrigine (2) and carbamazepine (4) peaks. In the latter case, resolution is maintained but peak order is changed. In the former the peak is not fully resolved from SKHQREDUELWRQH'URSSLQJWKHOHYHORIRUJDQLFPRGL¿HUWRSXOOSHDNVDQGDSDUWLVSRVVLEOHEXWZRXOGOHDGWRa longer overall run time for the separation.
1. Primidone
2. Lamotrigine
3. Phenobarbitone
4. Carbamazepine
5. Phenytoin
6. 5-(p-methylphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin
Column: (a)
(b) Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18, both 7.0 x 53mm Rocket™ hardware Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:30mM
Flow Rate: 2.3mL/min
Temperature:
Figure D
The Grace® Platinum™ column phases thus rely on 2 main separation mechanisms generated by the bonded alkyl groups and the residual silanols. An increase in the coverage of alkyl groups would lead to a proportionate reduction in the level of silanols. This could lead to reproducibility issues. However, due the bonding technology employed, the phases are very reproducible and RSDs for production are in the region of 2 – 3.4%. Ion exchange effects can be reduced by the use of buffers of the correct pH and molarity. Both volatile and non-volatile buffers in the range 1 to 10 may be used at typical levels of 25 – 50mmol.
Reproducibility is shown graphically in Figure E, with reproducibility for acids, bases and neutrals for batches to 2008.
Capacity Factors for Platinum EPS C18 1996-2008
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Figure E
Because of the reproducibility of the bonding, development of Grace® Platinum™ EPS column phases with surface coverages of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 (standard EPS), 1.5 and 2.0 µmoles/m2 were prepared and compared. Figure F shows the retention factors for a series of analytes for the 5 phases and Figure G the respective chromatograms. It can be seen that the non-polar molecules, biphenyl and toluene show the expected linear relationship based on carbon level while the more polar compounds show a plateau at higher coverage. This leads to pronounced changes in the polar/non-polar selectivity between polars and non-polar compounds. Note the relative movement of amitriptyline.
1. Cinnamic Acid
/ 50% 50mM P
otassium Phosp
2. Nitrobenzene
3. Toluene
4. Amitriptyline (shaded)
5. Biphenyl
0.25 µmole/m2
innamic Acid
itrobenzene
0.5 µmole/m2
1 µmole/m2
acity F
Cap 4
1.5 µmole/m2
2 µmole/m2
Column: Grace® Platinum™ C18, 4.6 x 100mm, 5µm
Mobile Phase: MeCN:50mM
18 Phase L
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
Temperature: 35ÛC
Figure F
Figure G
The use of 2 different controlled retention mechanisms of course is in addition to the normal LC variables of mobile phase strength and pH. Analyte ionization is an important LC parameter.
Figure H shows the variation in elution order with pH for a series of bases on a Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18 column. We can observe that the order changes with pH. Peak shape at pH 3 and 10 is better than at pH 7 under the elution conditions shown due to the pKa effect indicating the advantage of choosing elution pH conditions carefully.
1. Procaine
2. Lidocaine
3. Diphenhydramine
4. Nortriptyline
5. Amitriptyline
Column: Grace® Platinum™ 100 EPS C18,
Mobile Phase:
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
Figure H
5HFHQWO\VHYHUDOQHZSKDVHVKDYHEHHQLQWURGXFHGIURPPDMRUPDQXIDFWXUHUVWDUJHWLQJWKHSRODUPROHFXOH¿HOG)RXUVDPSOHVZLOOEHFRQVLGHUHGDQWLLQÀDPPDWRULHV)LJXUH,.HWRSURIHQGHJUDGDQWV)LJXUH-DQWLELRWLFV)LJXUH.DQGsome similar synthetic peptides3 (Figure L). The Grace® Platinum™ EPS C18 column is compared with a polar end-capped column, for extreme retention of non-polar and extremely polar alkyl compounds, an ether linked phenyl with polar end-capping, a sterically protected and highly endcapped polar embedded (amide) phase and 2 new fully bonded and endcapped C18 columns. The ketoprofen degradant example (Figure J) shows the increased retention of the polar degradants and the lower retention for the less polar degradants, reducing run time while not compromising resolution.
In the example of the antibiotics (Figure K), the majority of the phases will not fully resolve cephalexin and cepharadine but cephalothin has a long retention. Reducing the organic level to slow the chromatogram down should help with the GraceSmart™FROXPQEXWWKHRWKHUVZRXOGEHQH¿WIURPWKHXVHRIJUDGLHQWHOXWLRQ5HHTXLOLEUDWLRQWLPHZRXOGRIFRXUVHincrease the overall run cycle time in all these gradient cases.
The peptide comparison (Figure L) shows that the peptides have a much wider range of elution on the Grace®Platinum™ C18 (Grace® VisionHT™ C18-P) column compared to competitor columns. This allows much more scope for resolution of degradant material.
$QWLLQÀDPPDWRULHV
1. Ketoprofen
3. Flurbiprofen
2. Naproxen
4. Ibuprofen
Waters® Atlantis® T-3
Phenonemex Synergi™ Hydro-RP
Phenonemex Synergi™ Polar-RP
Mobile Phase: Methanol:25mM
Agilent Zorbax Bonus-RP
Grace® Platinum™ EPS
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
Detector:
Adjusted Organic
Mobile Phase
Grace® Platinum™ EPS
75% methanol, 83Bar
Phenonemex Synergi™ Hydro-RP
85% methanol, 105Bar
Waters® Atlantis® T-3
85% methanol, 94Bar
Mobile Phase: Methanol:25mM KH2PO4, pH 3
Grace® GraceSmart™
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
75% methanol, 98Bar
Detector:
Figure I
.HWRSURIHQ'HJUDGDQWV
Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:0.2% Formic Acid in Water
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
Grace® Platinum™ EPS
Temperature: 30ºC
40% Acetonitrile, 65Bar
Detector:
Test Probe: Ketoprofen
Phenonemex Synergi™ Hydro-RP
50% Acetonitrile, 82Bar
Waters® Atlantis® T-3
50% Acetonitrile, 81Bar
Grace® GraceSmart™
40% Acetonitrile, 76Bar
Figure J
$QWLELRWLFV
1. Cephalexin
Mobile Phase: Acetonitrile:25mM KH2PO4, pH 7 in Water
2. Cepharadine
Flow Rate: 1mL/min
3. Cephalothin
Temperature: 30ºC
Detector:
Grace® Platinum™ EPS, 10% Acetonitrile
Grace® GraceSmart™, 15% Acetonitrile
Phenomenex Synergi™ Hydro-RP, 15% Acetonitrile
Phenomenex Synergi™ Polar-RP, 15% Acetonitrile
Waters® Atlantis® T3, 15% Acetonitrile
Agilent Zorbax Bonus-RP, 15% Acetonitrile
Figure K
6LPLODU6\QWKHWLF3HSWLGHV
1. Ac-RGGGGLGLGK-amide (911 Da)
4. Ac-RGVGGLGLGK-amide (954 Da)
2. RGAGGLGLGK-amide (883 Da)
5. Ac-RGVVGLGLGK-amide (996 Da)
3. Ac-RGAGGLGLGK-amide (926 Da)
Competitor A
Competitor B
HPLC System:
Mobile Phase A:
Competitor C
Mobile Phase B:
Gradient (min, %B):
Grace® C18-B
Flow Rate:
Detector:
Grace® C18
Column Temperature:
Column Backpressure:
Figure L
Because of the mixed mode separation mechanism with the Grace® Platinum™ EPS column phase, it can show both reversed-phase and normal-phase activity with certain polar molecules. This is shown in Figure M with uracil. At very low and zero acetonitrile levels we see increased retention due to a reversed-phase mechanism, retention reaches a minimum with increasing acetonitrile, then starts to increase at very high percentages of the organic solvent using a normal-phase mechanism. The low coverage allows utilization of this property in that the materials are stable in 100% aqueous mobile phases, the C18 chains not being liable to phase dewetting. Retention of Uracil along with Acetonitrile%
on Grace® Platinum™ EPS Column
Tr(Uracil) in min 1.0
Acetonitrile% in mobile (with water, no buffer)
Figure M
From the work of Snyder et al4,5 on column comparisons, the separation mechanism contributions of hydrophobicity, steric effects, silanol effects (acidic and non-acidic) and ion-exchange effects can be determined. From a plot of hydrophobic interaction (H term) vs base interaction (C term at pH 7), a positioning of phases relative to each other can be determined and compared.
This is shown in Figure N for a selection of popular phases. It can be seen that Grace® Platinum™ and Grace® Platinum™ EPS column phases are positioned differently and well away from standard fully bonded materials and many new materials designed for polar analyte chromatography. The Grace® Platinum™ EPS column phase has a high base interaction but a relatively low hydrophobic interaction effect. Compare the location of the embedded phase Grace® Alltima™ HP C18 amide, Waters® Xterra™ C18 RP, Grace®Platinum™ C18, Phenomenex Luna® C18, Waters® Atlantis® T3, Grace® Alltima™ HP C18 HL column phases etc. The further away the columns are from one another the greater the selectivity difference.
Platinum™ C18 EPS
VisionHT™ C18-P
SELECTIVITY
VisionHT™ C18-B
Prevail™ C18
Alltima™ HP C18 EPS
Platinum™ C18
VisionHT™ C18
MODERATE
SELECTIVITY
GraceSmart™ RPC18
HYDROPHOBIC
SELECTIVITY
Alltima™ HP C18
INCREASING BASE INTERACTION (C)
VisionHT™ C18 HL
Alltima™ HP C18 HL
INCREASING HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTION (H)
Figure N
To increase the application range, Grace® Platinum™ column phases are available in particle sizes in
1.5µm, 3µm, 5µm, and 10µm. The 1.5µm phases are branded under the VisionHT™ name (VisionHT™ C18
is Platinum™ C18 and VisionHT™ C18-P is Platinum™ EPS C18). The 3, 5, and 10µm particles are available
in columns from micro-bore through analytical to preparative.
Conclusions
It can be seen that the Grace® Platinum™ column range of chromatography media, in particular the EPS
phases, are excellent choices for columns orthogonal in selectivity to standard, high coverage C18
columns. Their very reproducible mixed mode separation mechanism, coupled with traditional solvent
and pH selectivity variables, give a product ideally suited to pharmaceutical development.
References
1. LC-GC Intl, July 1998, I Chappell, S.C. McGee and R.J. Weigand2. LC-GC NA, Jan 2002, I Chappell3. Grace Poster 2008, Fast Separations of Peptides Using Small and Large Pore Sub-Two Micron Columns, Reno Nguyen, Scott Anderson, Mark Jacyno, Wendy Luo, Ian Chappell, Linda Xu, and Joyce Wang 4. “The “Hydrophobic-subtraction” Model of Reversed-phase Column Selectivity”, L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan and P.W. Carr, J. Chromatogr. A, 1060 (2004) 77 -116 .
5. “A New Look at the Selectivity of Reversed-phase HPLC Columns”, L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan and P.W. Carr, Anal. Chem., ALLTIMA™, BRAVA™, BRINGING SEPARATIONS TOGETHER™, PLATINUM™, PREVAIL™, ROCKET™, and VISIONHT™ are trademarks of Alltech Associates, Inc. GRACE DAVISON DISCOVERY SCIENCES™ and GRACESMART™ are trademarks of W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. GRACE® and GRACE DAVISON® are trademarks, registered in the United States and/or other countries, of W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. ACQUITY UPLC®, ATLANTIS®, SYMMETRY®, WATERS®, and XTERRA® are trademarks, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, Waters Investment, Ltd. SUNFIRE™ is a trademark of Waters Technologies Corporation. INERTSIL® is a trademark, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, GL Sciences, Inc. HYPERSIL® is a trademark, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, Thermo Hypersil-Keystone Inc. NUCLEOSIL® is a trademark, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, Macherey, Nagel GmbH & Co KG. SYNERGI™ is a trademark of Phenomenex, Inc. LUNA® is a trademark, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, Phenomenex, Inc. ZORBAX® is a trademark, registered in the United States and/or other countries of, Agilent Technologies, Inc. This trademark list has been compiled using available published information as of the publication date of this brochure and may not accurately reflect current trademark ownership. Grace Davison Discovery Sciences is a product group of W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Alltech Associates, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Copyright 2008 Alltech Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.
The information presented herein is derived from our testing and experience. It is offered for your consideration and verification. Since operating conditions vary significantly, and are not under our control, we disclaim all warranties on the results that may be obtained from the use of our products. W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. and its subsidiaries can not be held responsible for any damage or injury occurring as a result of improper installation or use of its products. Grace reserves the right to change prices and/or specifications without prior notification.

Source: http://www.mandel.ca/products/chromatography/Liquid_Chromatography/HPLC_Columns/Alltech_Platinum/Retention%20and%20Separation%20of%20Highly%20Polar%20Compounds%20on%20a%20Novel%20HPLC%20Phase.pdf