Iic_02_2012_inhalt 1.6

International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law (IIC) Editors: William R. Cornish, QC; LL.D. (Cambridge), F.B.A. Professor of Law, University of Cambridge, External Academic Member of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law . Josef Drexl, Dr. jur., LL.M. (Berkeley), Professor of Law, University of Munich, Director at the MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law .
Reto M. Hilty, Dr. jur., Professor of Law, University of Zurich and University of Munich, Director at the MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law . Jochen Pagenberg, Dr. jur., LL.M. (Harvard), Attorney-at-Law, Munich/Paris.
Executive Editors (by field): Josef Drexl (Antitrust) . Reto M. Hilty (Copyright, Design, IT) .
Annette Kur, Dr. jur., Professor of Law, MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Compe- tition Law (Unfair Competition, Trade Marks) . Jochen Pagenberg (Patents).
Executive Editors (by region): William R. Cornish (Commonwealth) . Christophe Geiger, Dr. jur., Associate Professor, University of Strasbourg, Senior Researcher, MaxPlanck Institute for Intel- lectual Property and Competition Law (France and French-speaking African countries) . Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, Dr. jur., MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law (Commonwealth) . Christopher Heath, Dr. jur., Judge, Boards of Appeal, European Patent Office, Munich (Asia) . Alexander Peukert, Dr. jur., Professor of Law, University of Frankfurt/Main (USA) . Sibylle Schlatter, MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law (civil law African countries, Latin America).
Legal Manager: Klaus D. Beiter, B.Iur., LL.B. (UNISA, Pretoria); Dr. jur. (Munich); Legal Print and Publishing Editor: Charles Heard.
Advisory Board: Paul Goldstein, Professor of Law, Stanford University . Jos Antonio GÕmez Segade, Dr. Dr. h.c., Professor of Law, University of Santiago de Compostela . Francis Gurry, Ph.D., Deputy Director General, World Intellectual Property Organization . Alexander von Mçhlendahl, Dr. jur., LL.M. J.D. (Northwestern University), Attorney-at-Law, Munich . Victor Nabhan, Dr., Professor of Law, Quebec, President of ALAI . Adrian Otten, Director, Intellectual Property Division, World Trade Organization . Jçrgen Schade, Dr. jur., former President of the German Patent and Trademark Office . Joanna Schmidt-Szalewski, Dr., Professor of Law, Stras- bourg . Luigi Carlo Ubertazzi, Dr., Professor of Law, Milan.
May be cited as 43 IIC page (2012) . ISSN 0018-9855 Contributions and correspondence concerning IIC should be addressed to: MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Marstallplatz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany.
Telephone: (0 89) 2 42 46-2 08. Telefax: (0 89) 2 42 46-5 01. Internet: http://www.ip.mpg.de.
Advertising Department: Verlag C.H. Beck, Wilhelmstrasse 9, D-80801 Munich, Germany; P.O.
Box40 03 40, D-80703 Munich, Germany.
Media Service: Tel. +49 (0)89-38189-781, Fax+49(0)89-38189-782, media-service @beck.de # 2012 Verlag C.H. Beck oHG, Wilhelmstr. 9, D-80801 Munich . Typesetting by Druckerei C.H.
Beck (see publisher's address) . Printed in Germany by Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Druckhaus Sinzheim, In den Lissen 12, D-76547 Sinzheim.
Published monthly except in January, April, July and October (8 times per year). Normal subscription rate: e388. Single issue e52,50. Prices for other countries by request. Postage and handling fees will be added. Cancellation of subscriptions: Publisher must be notified no later than 6 weeks prior to the end of the calendar year.
All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form whatsoever, e.g. by photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publishers. This journal was carefully produced in all its parts. Nevertheless, authors, editors and publishers do not warrant the information contained therein to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be teilweise auf Dritte zu çbertragen.
lich geschçtzt; das gilt auch fçr såmtli- arbeitet oder redigiert worden sind.
Manuskripte: Der Verlag haftet nicht fçr der gesetzlichen Schutzfrist einschlieû- of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Pp. 121±244 Published by the MaxPlanck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Marstallplatz 1, D-80539 Munich, Germany The Decision of the ECJ in Elf Aquitaine ± Parent and Subsidiary as a Multiple Team of Horses Draw- ing a Vehicle Under the Control of a Single Driver? . .
The Perfume Industry and Intellectual Property Law in the Jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of National Courts . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Amended Digital Economy Act 2010 as an Un- successful Attempt to Solve the Stand-Alone Com- plex of Online Piracy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Protection Norms of Indications of Geographical Origin in the Applicable EU Regulations ± Recent Changes and the Necessity for Further Unification . .
Focus on the Polish Regulation of Copyright and Design Overlap After the Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case 168/09 (Flos v. Semeraro) . . .
DecisionsIntellectual Property Law and JurisdictionThe Netherlands Brussels I Regulation, Art. 22(4) ± Rule of exclusive jurisdiction GAT/LuK judgement ± Where claim for provisional injunction measure concerning infringe- ment of IP right in another Member State countered with invalidity defence ± GAT/LuK doctrine applies to all IP rights in Article 22(4) ± Where invalidity defence raised ± Whether court loses jurisdiction over infringement claim ± 200.062.687/01 ± Yellow Page Marketing B.V. v. Yell Limited ± ``Yellow Pages' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First instance decision against government agency entrusted with marketing approval of pharma- ceuticals ± Provisional enforcement thereof to be denied ± Where this would raise barriers to market entry of new generic drugs, would deprive public from access to better drugs, and would give incentive to originator companies to file many new similar lawsuits ± Act No. 10.603/2002 on Data Exclusivity for Veterinary Products; Act No. 8437/92 on the Enforcement of Decisions, Art. 4 ± ANVISA v. Lund- beck Brasil Ltda ± ` Lex apro' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comment by Filipe Fischmann Patent application concerning drug ± Filed under old Reg. Fed. Ct. App. Industrial Property Code 1973, which excluded patentability of pharmaceutical compounds ± Wheth- er applicability of TRIPS Agreement to be considered ± Brazilian Industrial Property Act, Arts. 229, 230, 231 ± INPI v. Ely Lilly & Co. ± ` Ely Lilly' . . . . . . . . .
Granting of exclusive license ± By only one of several co-owners without consent of all of them ± Whether exclusive licensee can invoke license against other co-owners ± Use of licensed invention ± Patent infrin- gement ± Liability of co-owner granting license for damages towards licensee ± Intellectual Property Code, Sec. L. 613-29 ± Institut Pasteur v. Rupert Mutzel et al. ± ` Cell Suspension Device III' . . . . . . . . .
Inventions with reference to electronic data-proces- sing devices and processes (programs) ± Whether at least one part-aspect of subject-matter in technical field ± Whether merely constitutes program for data- processing systems ± If teaching contains instructions serving solution of concrete technical problem with technical means ± Process that serves data-processing execution of process stages in networked technical devices (server, clients) ± If devices not expressly mentioned in patent claim ± Patent Act, Sec. 1(1), (3) No. 3, (4) ± X ZR 121/09 ± ` Web Page Display' (Webseitenanzeige) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Admissibility of appeal ± Justification of appeal must disclose factual or legal points in which contested decision is incorrect in eyes of appellant ± Must state in detail the reasons why appellant holds previous court's factual and legal assessment to be incorrect ± Patent Act, Sec. 111(2); Code of Civil Procedure, Sec.
519(3) ± X ZR 58/08 ± ` Admissibility of Appeal' (Zulåssigkeit der Berufung) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed limitation of patent ± To overcome estoppel of invalidity in infringement action ± Requires at least pending correction trial before Japanese Patent Office ± Patent Act, Sec. 104ter; Utility Model Act, Sec. 30 ± K.K. Kotobuki v. Japan Post ± ` Fuminosuke Original Ball Point Pen' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal protection of designs ± EC Directive 98/71 ± Article 17 ± Obligation concerning cumulation of design protection with copyright protection ± National law precluding copyright protection or rendering it unenforceable for certain period in case of designs which entered public domain before entry into force of the law ± Principle of protection of legitimate expectations ± EC Directive 98/71 of 1998 on the Legal Protection of Designs, Art. 17 ± C-168/09 ± Flos SpA v. Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA and Assoluce ± Associazione nazionale delle Imprese degli Apparecchi di Illuminazione ± ``Flos v.
Semeraro Casa e Famiglia' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Making available/communication to public of soft- ware manifestly intended to make available protected works and objects to public without authorisation ± Criminal proceedings ± Damages for infringement of literary and artistic property rights ± Turnover of infringing company ± Poor quality of files made available ± Status of host ± Intellectual Property Code, Arts. L.212-3.1, L.213-1.2, L.215-1.2, L.335-4.1; Law of 9 July 2004 (LCEN), Art. 6-1-2 ± SCPP and SPPF v. Socit Mubility, Benoit T et al. ± ` radioblog.fr' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Copyright ± Infringement of right of reproduction ± Provision, without permission of respective broad- casting organisations, of time and space-shifting service of TV programs ± Enabling user living abroad to enjoy at any time TV programs broadcast in Japan via the internet ± Copyright Act, Sec. 112(1) ± 788 (Ju) of 2009 ± NHK (Japan Broadcasting Cor- poration), et al. v. Nihon Digital Co. Ltd. ± ` Roku- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comment by Tatsuhiro Veno Application for registration of Community figurative mark ` TiMi KiNDERJOGHURT'' ± Earlier word mark ` KINDER' ± Invalidity proceedings ± Assess- ment of similarity of signs ± Family of marks ± EC Reg. 40/94, Arts. 8(1)(b), (5), 52(1)(a) ± C-552/09 P ± Ferrero SpA v. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH Innsbruck ± ` KIN- DER/TiMi KiNDERJOGHURT' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Registration of trade mark requested in bad faith ± Can be declared void at all times ± Limitation period provided for in Sec. 174 of Brazilian Industrial Property Code solely applicable, provided there has been no bad faith in accordance with Art. 6bis(3) of Paris Convention ± Paris Convention, Art. 6bis(3), 6septies(3); Brazilian IP Code, Sec. 174 ± Sharp Equip- amentos et al. (in receivership) v. Sharp K.K. ± . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Comment by Christopher Heath Invalidation of trade mark based on unauthorised registration by agent or representative ± Cannot be requested where mark was filed by person that only later becomes agent or representative for sale of foreign goods bearing similar mark ± Paris Con- vention, Art. 6septies; Trade Mark Act, Sec. 53bis ± ` Agronatura' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unfair Competition Law ± Misappropriation of Trade SecretsUSA Unfair competition ± Importation ban for trade se- cret misappropriation occurring outside United States ± Tariff Act of 1930, Sec. 337; 19 U.S.C.
§ 1337 ± 2010-1395 ± Tianrui Group Co. and Another v. International Trade Commission and Amsted Industries Incorporated ± ``Tianrui v. Ams- ted' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Misappropriation of trade secrets ± Where former employee had access to and acquired confidential information about former employer's long-term stra- tegies, operating costs and customer negotiations ± Discretion of court to enjoin former employee from working for direct competitor ± Absence of re- strictive covenant ± Unfair competition ± Trade se- crets protection ± 10-1510 ± Bimbo Bakeries USA Inc. v. Chris Botticella ± ` Bimbo Bakeries' . . . . . . . . . .

Source: http://www.ip.mpg.de/files/pdf2/IIC_02_2012_Inhalt_Rev.pdf