International Consultative Workshop on “Anti-Malaria Drug Efficacy Studies in Ethiopia” The Ethiopian Health & Nutrition Research Institute, EHNRI, 8th & 9th of July 2013, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Executive Summary Background & Rationale
In line with the RBM/WHO recommendations, Ethiopia has embarked on the road to
malaria elimination, and aspires to achieve two major goals by 2015, that are;
eliminating malaria from the traditionally low malaria unstable transmission areas of the
country, and achieve zero malaria related mortality, in all malarious parts of the country.
Ethiopia, which is strongly supported by Global Fund and international partners, is
moving along to achieve these goals by employing one of the efficacious Artemisinin
Combination Therapies (ACTs), the Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL), which has been
the first line drug against Plasmodium falciparum since 2004/5. But, alarming news of P.
falciparum resistance to ACT has recently emerged in Cambodia and later spread to
The parasite, in this drug resistant (DR) hot spot region of the world has developed
reduced sensitivity to Artemisinin, and developed resistance to its major partner drugs in
ACT, including to the long acting new partner Piperaquine (PPQ). WHO, hence,
forwarded a drug resistant containment policy (DRCP) in Mekong Delta, using ACT
alternative drugs in the region. If ACT failure spreads further to Africa, countries like
Ethiopia may be forced to curb their elimination efforts, as was the case in 1960’s, when
developing countries were obliged to abort their eradication campaigns due to
Chloroquine resistance. We are now approaching the same cross road.
Workshop Objectives
In line with the above rationale, an international consultative workshop on “Anti-malarial
Drug Efficacy studies in Ethiopia” was organized by EHNRI, the Federal Ministry of
Health(FMOH), and WHO Ethiopia office, under the theme of “Strengthening the
collaborative efforts in Malaria Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) in Ethiopia”. Its major
To discuss the existing Artemisinin-Lumefantrine (AL) efficacy status in the
country, based on data presentations from Research Institutes, academia, FMOH
and its regional health bureaus (RHBs) , as well as the international partners:
CDC-USA, MACEPA-Path, Malaria Consortium, ICAP, The Carter Centre, and
WWARN (World-wide Antimalarial Resistance Network), etc.
to discuss the importance of installing a uniform data collection system for the
various malaria TES carried out in the country, i.e. adherence to standard WHO’s
protocols, in order to have a common basis for data validity & comparability,
to point out the way forward to enhance Ethiopia’s preparedness against the
to discuss specific challenges that Ethiopia is facing in light of the ongoing
Workshop Deliberations
More than 20 papers were presented in line with the 1st objective, inclusive of the
relevant opening addresses. The meeting was started with welcoming speech of Dr.
Almaz Abebe, Director of the Infectious/Non-Infectious Diseases’ Directorate, EHNRI,
and key note speech delivered by Dr. Daddi Jimma, the D/Director of EHNRI. Key note
addresses were also delivered by the representatives of the two workshop sponsors,
Miss Hiwot Solomon of FMOHE and Dr Kebba Omar Jiteh, representing Dr Pierre
MPELE-KILEBOU, WHO Representative of Ethiopia.
Presented papers in the first session focused on 1) the available data on malaria drug
resistance studies in Ethiopia and at global level 2) The effect of drug resistant
Plasmodium falciparum (DRPF) on elimination effort 3)The role of antigametocidal
drugs in malaria elimination including DRPF strains as well as in fighting vivax
relapses 4) The impact of Rapid Diagnostic tests, drug delivery systems, and
prescription patterns, in DRPF emergence and/ spread 5) The role of vector control to
reduce drug pressure 6) The positive impact of community education and information
provision ICC/BCC to bring about proper behavioral changes, especially in relation to
adherence to drug regimen, were all presented and discussed in the context of curbing
the emergence and/ spread of AL resistance in Ethiopia.
More than 20 papers were presented in line with the objective, inclusive of the relevant
opening addresses. The meeting was started with the welcoming speech of Dr. Almaz
Abebe, Director of the Infectious/Non-Infectious Diseases’ Directorate, EHNRI, and the
opening key note speech delivered by Dr. Daddi Jimma, the D/Director of EHNRI. Key
note addresses were presented by representatives of the two workshop sponsors, Miss
Hiwot Solomon of FMOHE & Dr Kebba Omar Jiteh of WHO.
The first session points on which the presented papers focused were: 1) the available
data on malaria drug resistance studies in Ethiopia and at global level 2) The effect of
drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum (DRPF) on elimination effort 3)The role of
antigametocidal drugs in malaria elimination including DRPF strains as well as in
fighting vivax relapse 4) The impact of Rapid Diagnostic tests, drug delivery systems,
and prescription patterns, in DRPF emergence &/or spread 5) The role of vector
control to reduce drug pressure 6) The positive impact of community education and
information provision ICC/BCC to bring about proper behavioral changes, especially in
relation to adherence to drug regimen, were all presented and discussed in the context
of curbing the emergence & spread of AL resistance in Ethiopia.
The 2nd part of the workshop was a final break out session, where participants were
grouped into three discussion teams. The following were discussion provoking points
provided in line with the paper presentation session:
• Standardizing efficacy data collection system (Adherence to WHO Protocol on
Malaria TES), (Developing protocol for Primaquine TES, unavailable in WHO
docs). As well as developing mechanisms to obtain Heath Centre/Hospital data
on A-L non respondents unavailable to Sentinel researchers
• Selection and Strengthening of drug resistance monitoring Sentinel sites
• Establishing a collaborative network among researchers in malaria TES &
Organizing central data storage system, for the country.
• Strengthening BCC at a country level to reduce anti malarial drug pressure.
• Inclusion of gametocidal and hypnotozoiticidal 8-aminoquinoliines like
Primaquine (PQ) into the antimalarial guideline:
o to assist the overall transmission reduction,
o to reduce spread of DRPF strains when emerging.
After thorough discussion by the three groups, the following summary recommendations
were forward as agreed upon by whole groups:
• Inclusion of gametocidal & hypnotozoiticidal 8-aminoquinoliines like Primaquine
o to assist the overall transmission reduction,
o to reduce the gamete based spread of DRPF strains when emerging.
After thorough discussion by the three groups, the following summary recommendations
were forward as agreed upon by whole groups:
1. Standardization of data collection: 1a/ The WHO protocol should be
considered as the minimum standard requirement to be fulfilled in all TES, and
hence, need be adhered. But 1b/ if there is a need for additional data, say data
on Day 0 drug level, or day 01 microscopic reading of parasitemia, or a day 07
treatment evaluation and an in vitro test results for correlation, etc. it must be a
free option to perform, as long as there is need and resources to carry them out
and the minimum requirements for the original study design (WHO) are not
compromised. 1c/ Unlike ACT, there is no clear guideline for Primaquine TES,
we recommend that WHO sees to its preparation.
2. From TES host constituent point of view, one of the major problems in efficacy
testing is the lack of enough patients to carry out the study, hence, as patient
availability will dwindle in the future with the progression of the elimination
process we recommend that: 2a/ Look for support from the RHBs on the
involvement of the catchment Health Posts, in recruiting cases to sentinel
centers, 2b/ In addition to the already identified sentinel sites at a national level,
consider the enlisting of demographic sentinel sites (DSS), in patient recruitment
to TES sentinel sites; or as recommended in 4b, strengthening them to perform
3. Collaboration in TES & Data Networking: 3a/ Call an all-embracing stake
holders meeting, and establish a malaria TES coordinating taskforce that leads
the planning, implementation and coordination of the various TES conducted in
the country, by different partners and governmental institutes, 3b/ develops the
terms of reference (TOR) for data networking, that need to be accessible to all
stake holders. 3c/ Prepare Memorandum of understanding (MOU) on the roles of
4. Sentinel Sites: Since most of the existing sentinel sites are less equipped and
deprived of skilled personnel to undertake drug efficacy studies, 4a/ Technical
capacity building need be done to strengthen the already selected sentinel sites.
4b/ The taskforce has to make clear standard criteria that sites have to fulfill to be
considered as sentinel sites. This includes the capacity to carry out TES as well
as to collect the necessary malariological parameters and socio-demographic
data, in the catchment area. 4c/ Based on these criteria, start evaluation of the
existing sites 4d/ Ways also have to be explored by the task force on how to
involve demographic surveillance sites (DSS) of universities, into the malaria
TES surveillance system. 4e/ Organize a sensitization workshop on malaria TES
for universities and related research institutes in the country, to widen the
research opportunities of graduate students on one hand and to foster the
skilled manpower base of Sentinel sites on the other.
5. Developing mechanisms to obtain Heath Centre/Hospital data on AL non respondents.
5a/ FMOH should take the lead in creating strong collaborations with RHBs,
research institutes, NGO in reporting AL non respondents. 5b/ the data capturing
system of AL non respondents should be nationally prepared by FMoH and
related to EHNRI, this can be done by including such cases in PHEM reports. 5c/
AL non respondent should be operationally defined by FMOH viz. If a person
comes within 4 weeks time of AL treatment for P. falciparum and presents with
confirmed PF manifestations should be suspected of Treatment failure (TF), be
6. IEC/BCC. 6a/ In accordance with the current BCC strategy of the country
outlined on the malaria strategic plan, strengthen its activities to include
awareness creation on patient adherence to ACT drug regimen to reduce anti
malarial drug pressure.6b/ Include as BCC activities, the discouragement of use
of Artemisia leaf as a traditional drug for malaria .
7. Gametocidals: 7a/ In line with WHO recommendations, to interrupt malaria
transmission, include a single dose (0.75mg) PQ in combination with ACT during
P. falciparum chemotherapy; 7b/Compile data on currently ongoing efforts by
EHNRI and partners to map Glucose 6 Phosphate dehydogenase, G6PD,
8. P. vivax malaria. 8a/ In light of ongoing elimination efforts in Ethiopia and
considering the specific challenges associated with identifying asymptomatic
individuals with liver stage parasites, P. vivax may very well turn out to be the
“last man standing” in areas where elimination has almost been achieved. Drug
resistance surveillance should therefore include P. vivax malaria wherever
possible. 8b/ Strategies specifically targeted at P. vivax elimination need to be
discussed (potentially in a P. vivax expert group under the Ministry of Health /
EHNRI). 8c/ Based on G6PD deficiency data collected by EHNRI consider
introduction of an-aminoquinolines for the radical cure of vivax malaria.
Closing Remark: Finally the workshop was closed by, Dr. Amha Kebede, Director
General, EHNRI, who promised that EHNRI will do its level best to fulfill the
recommendations forwarded. He remarked that coordinating AL resistance studies and
establishing a central data base is an important initial step in preparedness to monitor
the emergence of drug resistance; but this doesn’t necessarily mean EHNRI is
controlling the data’s public use, said Dr.Amha. He thanked organizers and participants
for successfully completing the workshop that proposed important recommendations of
national significance, and stressed the relevance of periodic organization of similar
consultative workshops annually/biannually.
The workshop was attended by over 55 participants from FMOH/RHBs, WHO,
Research Institutes, Academia, National and International partners.
STATE OF THE EVIDENCE What is the Connection Between Chemicals and Breast Cancer? Breast cancer now strikes more women than any other type of cancer, the result of adramatic increase that has taken place in the industrialized world during the past halfcentury. Whereas one in 22 women were diagnosed with breast cancer in the 1940s, nowthe incidence is one in eight. Of all women who die of